5 Comments
May 23, 2022Liked by Carsten Mueller

Thank you for starting the blog, seems very interesting! I had Millicom on radar for a while and recently bought when the price got too low. Especially telecom seems very unpopular right now. What’s your opinion on the rights offering? I was surprised by the dilution.

Expand full comment
author

I do agree that cables/telecom are unpopular. Millicom is especially unpopular given they did not deliver on their targets in the past. It is also viewed as less stable given it is a Swedish company, also listed in the US which does all of their business in Latam (on previously in Africa). The rights issue has been a big overhang and I hope it cleans the air for the future. I was not shocked by the deep discount - it will not harm me economically as long as I subscribe which I will do - as pretty much all insiders. Deeply discounted risghts issues are a Greenblatt special situation and may well provide an opportunity.

For TIGO, I expect that another special situation, the spin-off of their tower portfolio will be in the cards maybe in the next year or so whicht might unlock some value. For a full bull case in TIGO (maybe to optimistic), it is worth looking at Packer's piece on VIC.

Expand full comment
May 26, 2022Liked by Carsten Mueller

Great post, just a question, I don’t quite understand your reasoning regarding the EUR 17,5bn in value of Bollore’s assets turning into EUR 37bn. The amount of distributable assets doesn’t change with a complex ownership structure so in my reasoning the maximum distribution remains EUR 17,5bn or am I missing something?

Expand full comment
author

Fair point. You are right that there is no magic (or biblical) multiplication of assets out of the blue.

The 37bn is more the result of a thought experiment I performed in order to take into account the self-owned shares in the holding structure.

In my view, there are two way of looking at this: One would be fixing the asset base (17.5bn) and then adjust the number of outstanding shares and, in effect, the "real market cap".

Two is the way I chose, assuming a distribution of everything at BOL and then ODET level. Given that some of the distributions come back to BOL/ODET, you essentially distribute 17.5bn in step 1, get about half of this back, distribute this again and so forth.

Effectively, both methods should yield the same result, yet #2 was somehow more intuitive and easier to calculate for me.

Hope this clarifies your point.

Expand full comment

Thanks, the opaque structure definately requires some creative thinking to

unravel (and set up).

Expand full comment